I received this note just now on David Bennahum's Community Memory mailing list. It's history in the making.
This morning at 9:00 a.m. EST a three-judge panel in Philadelphia ruled that the Communications Decency Act violates the principles of the First and Fifth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States, and overturned the law. A full text of the decision is available at:
http://www.vtw.org/speech/decision.html
It is a remarkable document [~250K] which describes the origins of the Internet, and the technology which makes the Internet possible, in plain, clear English. The word cyberspace is used extensively. The decision then goes on to conclude that the CDA is unconstitutional in the United States. What follows is an excerpt of the conclusion, written by Judge Dalzell:
True it is that many find some of the speech on the Internet to be offensive, and amid the din of cyberspace many hear discordant voices that they regard as indecent. The absence of governmental regulation of Internet content has unquestionably produced a kind of chaos, but as one of plaintiffs' experts put it with such resonance at the hearing:
What achieved success was the very
chaos that the Internet is. The
strength of the Internet is that
chaos.
Just as the strength of the Internet is chaos, so the strength of our liberty depends upon the chaos and cacophony of the unfettered speech the First Amendment protects.
For these reasons, I without hesitation hold that the CDA is unconstitutional on its face.
In the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania"
| TBTF HOME |
CURRENT ISSUE |
TBTF LOG |
TABLE OF CONTENTS |
TBTF THREADS |
SEARCH TBTF |