from TBTF for 2000-04-19
Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2000 02:09:44 -0400
From: Matthew Gaylor <freematt@coil.com>
Subject: Republican Leadership's dot.gov Scam?
[Note from Matthew Gaylor: It seems that the US House of Representatives,
Republican leadership conference has established http://www.gop.gov/. A
misuse of the domain name system which gives the impression of official .gov
sanction when the site is really just a politics as usual, partisan site. To
be fair the Republicans claim that their site is in Beta and that it is an
official site due to their Congressional status. I find much of this idea
rather offensive and unfair to Independents and third parties who will not
be afforded the opportunity to hide partisanship under a mask of legitimacy.
Of special note is the use of a private ISP, Capital Area Internet Service
(CAIS-DOM) to host the site. Is this to bypass the congressional system and
if so why?]
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2000 18:10:41 -0700
To: farber@cis.upenn.edu (Dave Farber), freematt@coil.com (Matthew Gaylor),
State and Local Freedom of Information Issues <FOI-L@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>
From: Jim Warren <jwarren@well.com>
Subject: fwd: www.gop.gov ??!!!
I just received this from a friend.
>Did you see that the Republican Party has established the domain
>www.gop.gov? I'm very surprised that a partisan group could have a .gov
>domain. I was also very disturbed by the fact that I couldn't get into
>the site without accepting all the cookies that were being set. Looks
>like a bad precedent to me on both counts.
1. I wonder if this is really a Republican Party website -- as it's name
certainly implies? The InterNIC Finger gives no listing for it.
[Note from Matt Gov't sites need to looked up on www.nic.gov]
2. I completely agree with the writer: Who the hell is granting dot-GOV
status to a @#$%^ political party?!
3. And if they're going to give ".GOV" status to the Republicrats (and,
presumably, the Demopublicans), will they also give it to the Libbies, and
the Peace & Freedom ... and the Flat Earth Party, and the 4th Reich, et
al?! Maybe this is the first step to making dog-GOV meaningless as a
top-level domain.
4. When I attempted to go to it's home-page, I too, found that it tried to
set two cookies -- which I refused. Then it promptly died saying, "No
Cookie! To access this site your browser must be accepting cookies."
5. Pretty damned arrogant no matter who's running it -- but especially if
it really is the Repub Party. (The Party of the People? Apparently not
unless the People let the Party set tracking/surveillance cookies ... and
gawd knows what else!)
--jim, Jim Warren; jwarren@well.com
Contributing Editor & technology public-policy columnist, MicroTimes Magazine
Also GovAccess list-owner/editor; 345 Swett Rd, Woodside CA 94062
voice/650-851-7075; fax-for-the-quaint/650-851-2814
[self-inflating puff: Hugh Hefner First-Amendment Award, Playboy Foundation;
Electronic Frontier Foundation Pioneer Award (in its first year);
James Madison Freedom-of-Information Award, Soc.of Prof.Journalists-Nor.Calif
founded InfoWorld; the Computers, Freedom & Privacy Conferences; etc etc etc.]
And...
From: Jim Warren <jwarren@WELL.COM>
Subject: Re: fwd: www.gop.gov ??!!!
To: FOI-L@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
Ahah! The plot thickens.
On the one hand, www.gop.gov -- by its dot-GOV domain-name -- pretends to
be an official government site. And from what those who've accepted its
cookies say, it *says* it's an official site of an official caucus within
the official House of the official Congress.
However ... curiously, it appears that -- in spite of it's dot-GOV name --
it's being run as a private operation through a private ISP, and definitely
*not* through any official congressional system! See the following, that
just came in from a net-geek friend.
--jim
>A "WHOIS" on gop.gov didn't turn up anything at networksolutions
>but I did find that the domain is hosted at Capital Area Internet
>Service in McLean...
>
>Capital Area Internet Service (CAIS-DOM)
> 6861 Elm Street, Third Floor
> McLean, VA 22101
> US
>
> Domain Name: CAIS.COM
>
> Administrative Contact, Technical Contact, Zone Contact:
> Network Operations Center (CAIS-NOC) domreg@CAIS.NET
> CAIS Internet
> 1255 22nd Street
> Washington, DC 20037
> US
>
> (202) 715-1300 -- NOC (703) 448-2091 Fax- - (703) 790-8805
> Billing Contact:
> Billing Office (BO-ORG) billing@CAIS.COM
> CAIS Internet
> 6861 Elm Street, Third Floor
> McLean, VA 22101
> US
**************************************************************************
Subscribe to Freematt's Alerts: Pro-Individual Rights Issues
Send a blank message to: freematt@coil.com with the words subscribe FA
on the subject line. List is private and moderated (7-30 messages per month)
Matthew Gaylor,1933 E. Dublin-Granville Rd., PMB 176, Columbus, OH 43229
Archived at http://www.egroups.com/list/fa/
**************************************************************************
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2000 14:17:16 -0400
From: Matthew Gaylor
Subject: Republican Explanation of GOP.gov
From: "Diamond, Richard" <Richard.Diamond@mail.house.gov>
To: Declan McCullagh <declan@wired.com>, CYBERIA-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM,
fight-censorship@vorlon.mit.edu, cypherpunks@cyberpass.net,
farber@cis.upenn.edu, freematt@coil.com, FOI-L@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU,
Jim Warren <jwarren@well.com>
Cc: gnu@toad.com
Subject: RE: Republican Leadership's dot.gov Scam?
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2000 11:52:44 -0400
Most of the opposition to the domain name gop.gov seems to be based on
misunderstandings. First, the web server for GOP.gov is physically located
within the offices of the House Republican Conference. The private vendor
you see in the WHOIS listing merely handles the DNS hosting (which is all
that the WHOIS listing tells you). As someone pointed out already, it
wouldn't really make a difference if it were outsourced to a private
company. I just want to point out that it isn't.
Second, there are only two parties in Congress. The only "independents"
(Virgil Goode and Bernie Sanders) caucus with either the Republican and
Democrats. So, yes, whether you like it or not "Republican" and "Democrat"
are part of the institution that is the U.S. Congress. This top level
domain reflects the institution. If the flat earth society can get a
majority in Congress, they can have their own .gov -- but not until then --
and that's what the RFC says.
Third, although gop.gov currently only hosts information for the majority
party in the House of Representatives, it may offer information from the
Senate in the future. That's one reason why it does not have "house" in the
domain. Another reason is simplicity -- www.gop.gov is easier to remember.
If you want to complain about us not using hierarchical domain names, then
start your complaint with the administration. After all, "www.irs.gov"
should be "www.irs.unitedstatestreasurydepartment.whitehouse.gov" if you
follow that line of thought.
Richard Diamond
Office of the Majority Leader
US House of Representatives
www.freedom.gov
-----Original Message-----
>From: Jim Warren <jwarren@WELL.COM>
>Subject: Re: fwd: www.gop.gov ??!!!
>To: FOI-L@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
>
>Ahah! The plot thickens.
>
>On the one hand, www.gop.gov -- by its dot-GOV domain-name -- pretends to
>be an official government site. And from what those who've accepted its
>cookies say, it *says* it's an official site of an official caucus within
>the official House of the official Congress.
[snip]
**************************************************************************
Subscribe to Freematt's Alerts: Pro-Individual Rights Issues
Send a blank message to: freematt@coil.com with the words subscribe FA
on the subject line. List is private and moderated (7-30 messages per month)
Matthew Gaylor,1933 E. Dublin-Granville Rd., PMB 176, Columbus, OH 43229
Archived at http://www.egroups.com/list/fa/
**************************************************************************
| TBTF HOME |
CURRENT ISSUE |
TBTF LOG |
TABLE OF CONTENTS |
TBTF THREADS |
SEARCH TBTF |
Copyright © 1995-2000 by Keith Dawson. Commercial use prohibited. May be excerpted, mailed, posted, or linked for non-commercial purposes.
Created 2000-04-16